Quote from comp.object
From: frebe <frebe73_at_gmail.com>
Date: 27 Feb 2007 07:09:17 -0800
Message-ID: <1172588957.547631.285910_at_h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
"A typical SQL DBMS requires _drastically_ faster hardware than a hierarchical database to provide even roughly equivalent response time
-- to the point that a SQL DBMS running on current hardware is about
the
same speed (or slighthly slower) than a hierarchical database was around
25 years ago, running on hardware that was current at the time.
Date: 27 Feb 2007 07:09:17 -0800
Message-ID: <1172588957.547631.285910_at_h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
"A typical SQL DBMS requires _drastically_ faster hardware than a hierarchical database to provide even roughly equivalent response time
-- to the point that a SQL DBMS running on current hardware is about
the
same speed (or slighthly slower) than a hierarchical database was around
25 years ago, running on hardware that was current at the time.
As far as normalization goes: back then, normalization was a way of
life
-- normalization reduces redundancy, and given the cost of storage at
the time, redundancy was _expensive_ (even ignoring inflation, one
month's rent on a 1.8 GB disk drive in 1982 would buy enough disks for
quite a large RAID today). "
Any comments? Received on Tue Feb 27 2007 - 16:09:17 CET