Re: Designing database tables for performance?
From: BobTheDataBaseBoy <"xxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:44:07 -0500
Message-ID: <POKdnVjeLsSvdH3YnZ2dnUVZ_u2mnZ2d_at_rcn.net>
>
> Sweet Jesus. I've read a few more threads now, and it doesn't get
> much better in here, does it?
>
> I'm outta here; this froup isn't worth my time. But just before I go,
> I'd like to state categorically and for the record that I only have a
> small penis, I can't piss more than a couple of inches, and my dad is
> a wimp.
>
> But before I go, can anyone suggest a froup or site where people talk
> about database theory?
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:44:07 -0500
Message-ID: <POKdnVjeLsSvdH3YnZ2dnUVZ_u2mnZ2d_at_rcn.net>
Lemming wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 21:44:35 GMT, Bob Badour
> <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> To exactly what sort of logic does it apply? Predicate logic? First >> order? Second order? >>
>
> Sweet Jesus. I've read a few more threads now, and it doesn't get
> much better in here, does it?
>
> I'm outta here; this froup isn't worth my time. But just before I go,
> I'd like to state categorically and for the record that I only have a
> small penis, I can't piss more than a couple of inches, and my dad is
> a wimp.
>
> But before I go, can anyone suggest a froup or site where people talk
> about database theory?
Well, the various xml groups are all agog with XQuery beating the bejesus out of SQL (not to say RDBMS). There may be something of interest over there. And, as you see, c.d.t has low mean value and high variance and high skew. Don't miss Vadim's stuff though. He knows something.
>
> Regards,
>
> Lemming
Received on Sun Feb 25 2007 - 02:44:07 CET