Re: Constraints and Functional Dependencies

From: mAsterdam <>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 21:43:54 +0100
Message-ID: <45e0a32a$0$334$>

paul c wrote:

> I don't think it is the same, rather it is the opposite - I don't think
> the definition assumes any keys at all. As I said, that's okay by me.

Please see my reply to your earlier post.


>> Slightly more important: at this stage in the OP's
>> argumentation the term (candidate) key has not yet been defined.
>> ...

> It looked to me as if the OP did define it.

It did. Later. Received on Sat Feb 24 2007 - 21:43:54 CET

Original text of this message