JOG wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2:18 pm, "David BL" <davi..._at_iinet.net.au> wrote:
>
>>[snip]
>>I still think we have a quite different understanding of what (in
>>practical terms) we mean by "entity". I think you're still
>>associating it with ERMs (even if you distinguish instance from type)
>>while I'm not. Let me explain what I mean by that...
>>
>>You question whether written papers have an authors property or vice
>>versa. For me that question only arises at the point where you try
>>to create an ERM.
>
> Well yes I do see that. But I /don't/ think those issues start at the
> ERM, so I'm more than happy to address things outside the E/RM, at a
> 'real world' level (apologetic quotes for obvious reasons).
Hey, it's pretty clear to me: authors and papers are properties of the
ISBN entity.
Received on Wed Feb 21 2007 - 15:17:39 CST
