| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Objects and Relations
Walt wrote:
> "David BL" <davidbl_at_iinet.net.au> wrote in message
> news:1172023595.106358.33710_at_q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
>>On Feb 21, 12:03 am, "Walt" <wami..._at_verizon.net> wrote: >> >>>In casual conversation, ER modelers will tend to use the simple word >>>"entity" in place of either "entity set" or "entity instance", leaving
>>>listener to disambiguate by means of the context in whuch the word
>>>By analogy, in casual conversation, object oriented programmers will use
>>>simple word "object" in place of either "object class" or "object
>>>similarly leaving disambiguation up to the listener. >>> >>>The problem comes when the listener is not familiar with the underlying
>>>of thinking. In that case, the listener will sometimes disambiguate >>>incorrectly. That is why introductory tutorials on object oriented >>>programming tend to spell out "object class" or "object instance", at
>>>until the reader can be presumed to have gotten accustomed to the mode
>>>thinking. I'm sure you will have noticed this, if you've gone back and
>>>some introductory material after gaining proficiency. >>> >>>Similarly, introductory material on ER modeling should spell out when
>>>are talking about the "set of all vehicles" and when we are talking
>>>particular vehicle". Some such material does this. >>> >>>Discourse in this newgroup tends to be a little more formal than casual >>>conversation, but far less formal than introductory tutorials. >>> >>>Hope this helps. >> >>I prefer to only use "object" to mean instance. Why would one say >>object when one means class? ie given that we have different words >>for these different concepts, let's use them!
If "object" means object instances exclusively, then the term is synonymous with "variable". Why would one say "object" when one means "variable" ? Received on Wed Feb 21 2007 - 09:09:20 CST
![]() |
![]() |