Re: Objects and Relations

From: Walt <wamitty_at_verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:45:47 GMT
Message-ID: <%ZgCh.1268$aM.1130@trndny03>

"David BL" <davidbl_at_iinet.net.au> wrote in message news:1171843561.587419.79320_at_s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 18, 12:48 am, "Marshall" <marshall.spi..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 17, 4:39 am, "JOG" <j..._at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > "It seems to be the closest fit to how the mind works"
> >
> > > Gah....Unghhh....<gnashing of teeth/>
> >
> > I know what you mean.
> >
> > The phrase "how the mind works" is high on my list
> > of signals that sets off the crank-o-meter. It's ideal
> > for the crank because it sounds super-smart and
> > it doesn't mean a goddamn thing.
> >
> > Marshall
>
> All I'm saying is that nouns are fundamental to how we think. The
> claim that "entities are illusionary" is high on my list of signals
> that sets off the crank-o-meter.
>

Illusions are fundamental to how the mind works.

There. That should set off everbody's crank-o-meter. Received on Mon Feb 19 2007 - 06:45:47 CST