On 18 fév, 19:01, paul c <toledobythe..._at_oohay.ac> wrote:
> Cimode wrote:
>
> > While I agree with the general thematics guiding the above description
> > of RM vs OO, I would like to draw your attention on the danger of
> > locking up RM in an elitist bias.
> > ...
>
> It's the savages who should be locked up, not the RM which needs to be
> protected from being mangled by them. Nothing wrong with intelligent bias.
>
> p
*savages*? Is there a need for such etymology from another time?
People maybe *misguided*, *uneducated* but what exactly is a
*savage*?. On a scientifc perspective, Elitist bias is the opposite
of intelligence. Elitism is a power driven phenomenon. How can
power driven motives help scientifc progress?
Received on Sun Feb 18 2007 - 12:41:44 CST
