Re: Objects and Relations

From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:43:53 GMT
Message-ID: <tVOAh.986042$5R2.538021@pd7urf3no>

Keith H Duggar wrote:
> David BL wrote:
> ...

>>An interesting question is whether we try to distinguish
>>pieces that for all intensive purposes look the same.

>
>
> The phrase is "intents and purposes". And "look the same"
> hardly encompasses all the facts we can state (see below).
> ...

Heh, looks like the Rev. Spooner is alive and well at c.d.t. So fitting too as half the posts here are based on faith. I would like to see a glossary of c.d.t. spoonerisms. Right now, the only one my feeble memory contains has nothing to do with c.d.t (but then again, maybe a good spoonerism would have nothing to do with anything). this one came from former mother-in-law who was an unwitting master of them - she was very fond of Elizabeth Beaten furniture.

p Received on Wed Feb 14 2007 - 19:43:53 CST