Re: Objects and Relations

From: Roy Hann <specially_at_processed.almost.meat>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:41:00 -0000
Message-ID: <JcednWr8ebI7y07YnZ2dnUVZ8qqlnZ2d_at_pipex.net>

"Cimode" <cimode_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1171470284.247642.69150_at_s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com...

> In order words surrogate keys are *practical*?

If you like, although in colloquial English that could be misinterpreted to mean "recommended as best practice". I might prefer to say only that they can be convenient but have no theoretical requirement to be used.

Roy Received on Wed Feb 14 2007 - 17:41:00 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Neo: "Re: Navigation question"
Previous message: Valentin Minzatu: "Re: Designing database tables for performance?"
Maybe in reply to: Marshall: "Re: Objects and Relations"
In reply to Cimode: "Re: Objects and Relations"
Next in thread: Cimode: "Re: Objects and Relations"
Reply: Cimode: "Re: Objects and Relations"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message