Re: cdt glossary 0.1.1 (repost)
From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 11 Feb 2007 06:46:03 -0800
Message-ID: <1171205163.898138.188760_at_a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
Date: 11 Feb 2007 06:46:03 -0800
Message-ID: <1171205163.898138.188760_at_a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
On 11 fév, 00:09, mAsterdam <mAster..._at_vrijdag.org> wrote:
> No procedure to insure consensus is in place.
Thinking about it may help...For instance taking the habit of
reminding people what the current definition is and updat it only if
and only if there is consensus a thread. That should limit the number
of updates and alleviate the workload.
> Some at cdt dislike the glossary altogether.
Unless they propose one equivalent according to their definitions,
just ignore them...
Good luck and thank you. Received on Sun Feb 11 2007 - 15:46:03 CET