Re: OT (sets and stuff)
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 00:42:07 +0100
Message-ID: <45c91235$0$328$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
>
> How would you address a person who writes: "It's [Neo's] own fault. It
> is simply unwilling to learn the basics on its own. It demands spoon
> feeding. And even then it spits up quite often." And why would you
> expect Keith to respond to a serious challenge when he doesn't respond
> to simple questions? And why would one need to resort to a serious
> challenge to ask simple questions? How can one estimate Keith, if he
> doesn't answer questions or explain his logic, but instead offers
> insults?
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 00:42:07 +0100
Message-ID: <45c91235$0$328$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Neo wrote:
>>> Can Mamma Keith explain without a whipping? >> Please do not underestimate Keith. >> Seriously inviting him to a challenge will do a better job >> getting him to contribute than this thin tease.
>
> How would you address a person who writes: "It's [Neo's] own fault. It
> is simply unwilling to learn the basics on its own. It demands spoon
> feeding. And even then it spits up quite often." And why would you
> expect Keith to respond to a serious challenge when he doesn't respond
> to simple questions? And why would one need to resort to a serious
> challenge to ask simple questions? How can one estimate Keith, if he
> doesn't answer questions or explain his logic, but instead offers
> insults?
I see I was overly optimistic.
You did not answer
>> Why/how would/could another symbol be /more/ correct?
Received on Wed Feb 07 2007 - 00:42:07 CET