Re: OT (sets and stuff)

From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 00:42:07 +0100
Message-ID: <45c91235$0$328$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>

Neo wrote:

>>> Can Mamma Keith explain without a whipping?
>> Please do not underestimate Keith.
>> Seriously inviting him to a challenge will do a better job
>> getting him to contribute than this thin tease.

>
> How would you address a person who writes: "It's [Neo's] own fault. It
> is simply unwilling to learn the basics on its own. It demands spoon
> feeding. And even then it spits up quite often." And why would you
> expect Keith to respond to a serious challenge when he doesn't respond
> to simple questions? And why would one need to resort to a serious
> challenge to ask simple questions? How can one estimate Keith, if he
> doesn't answer questions or explain his logic, but instead offers
> insults?

I see I was overly optimistic.

You did not answer
 >> Why/how would/could another symbol be /more/ correct? Received on Tue Feb 06 2007 - 17:42:07 CST