> > Can Mamma Keith explain without a whipping?
>
> Please do not underestimate Keith.
> Seriously inviting him to a challenge will do a better job
> getting him to contribute than this thin tease.
How would you address a person who writes: "It's [Neo's] own fault. It
is simply unwilling to learn the basics on its own. It demands spoon
feeding. And even then it spits up quite often." And why would you
expect Keith to respond to a serious challenge when he doesn't respond
to simple questions? And why would one need to resort to a serious
challenge to ask simple questions? How can one estimate Keith, if he
doesn't answer questions or explain his logic, but instead offers
insults?
Received on Tue Feb 06 2007 - 10:56:07 CST
