Re: Failure Modes and Ranges of Operation
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 23:28:07 -0800
Message-ID: <9m2bs2hqp2hgjs3o47rkvg1uv3gfo5t1oc_at_4ax.com>
Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>Bob Badour wrote:
>
>> Failure mode analysis is very important in engineering. I wonder whether
>> it has any supporting theory? Certainly, one can think of general
>> principles. Likewise, beyond statistical analysis and empirical
>> measurement, does any theory exist regarding ranges of operation?
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>
>It occurs to me that naive and ill-considered solutions actually
>discourage proper failure mode analysis. SQL and NULL demonstrate this
>clearly.
>
>It seems the SQL folks used NULL as a crutch to avoid thinking about
>important issues. For example, consider all the places where SQL returns
>NULL when we know that is just plain wrong and where a perfectly valid,
>correct answer exists: e.g. summation over zero elements.
I got bit by this not too long ago. I am not happy. It makes YA thing to check when writing SQL.
>It strikes me the SQL folks probably mistook summation over zero
>elements for a failure condition and had fallen into the habit of
>substituting NULL for thought when it comes to failure modes. Regardless
>what some may believe, no rational justification exists to equate
>divison by zero with NULL, and yet SQL does it.
There is that, too?
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices.Received on Sun Feb 04 2007 - 08:28:07 CET