Re: The term "theory" as in "database theory"

From: Walt <wamitty_at_verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 21:50:48 GMT
Message-ID: <YmOwh.42$Yl3.31_at_trndny09>


"Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:YD2wh.395$R71.6839_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> Walt wrote:
>
> > "Bob Badour" <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> > news:wLQuh.5991$1x.103488_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> >
> >>Marshall wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.databases.theory/browse_thread/
> >>>thread/a21a30b6a663dab3
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >
> >>Hmmm.... google groups does not appear to be complete.
> >
> > The friendly usenet forwarders split a single URL into two lines of
text.
>
> Oh, I know how to put URL's back together.

Oh. I figured you knew how to. Perhaps I should have figured you knew when to.

> I don't think google groups
> has my earliest posts to Dawn anymore. Or perhaps, the posts were in a
> different group and I forgot where.

I think they were in this group. I share your sense that the earliest posts from Dawn were before October of 2003.
Or perhaps it just seems longer. Received on Fri Feb 02 2007 - 22:50:48 CET

Original text of this message