Re: Nulls, integrity, the closed world assumption and events

On 25 Jan 2007 06:31:02 -0800, "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote:

>> >I dunno. What's the real problem? Is it that she promotes a
>> >non-relational database model in a general database theory group which
>> >happens to be over-populated with RM practitioners? No. It is that she does so dishonestly.
>
>I consider that a cruel attack. It is the reason I am bothering to
>respond at all I value my honesty. I can accept challenges to my
>intelligence. I am sure there are more intelligent people on this
>list, by whatever intelligence measurements one might make. However,
>I've been told all my life that I was intelligent, so I don't need the
>affirmation from cdt. I will say that I am not stupid, however, even
>if I sometimes say stupid things. I can also accept challenges to my
>knowledge, as I am surely ignorant of many things (who isn't?) But I
>absolutely do not engage in discussion here dishonestly.

Please be more careful with your attributions/quoting.

Lemming

-- 
Curiosity *may* have killed Schrodinger's cat.