No it is not. (Was: Is RM flawed?)

From: Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: 29 Dec 2006 15:30:21 -0800
Message-ID: <1167435021.320631.186130_at_73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com>

...

Marshall Received on Sat Dec 30 2006 - 00:30:21 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tonkuma: "Re: Network Example: Sibling of Opposite Gender"
Previous message: Aloha Kakuikanu: "Re: Concurrency in an RDB"
In reply to:(deleted message) Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer: "Is RM flawed?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message