Re: Databases as objects

From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 21 Dec 2006 07:45:20 -0800
Message-ID: <1166715919.945251.32250_at_80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com>

Thomas Gagne wrote:
<<If you agree there's such a thing as an object-relational impedance mismatch, then perhaps its because you're witnessing the negative consequences of tightly coupling objects that shouldn't be tightly coupled. >>
A database is an object? Impedance mismatch? No need to go any further...I suggest you do some reading

Introduction to Databases Theory CJ Date. Database In Depth CJ Date

Hope this helps... Received on Thu Dec 21 2006 - 16:45:20 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bob Badour: "Re: Databases as objects"
Previous message: Thomas Gagne: "Databases as objects"
In reply to: Thomas Gagne: "Databases as objects"
Next in thread: Bob Badour: "Re: Databases as objects"
Reply: Bob Badour: "Re: Databases as objects"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message