Re: Concurrency in an RDB

From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_ocis.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:17:26 -0800
Message-ID: <6jp5o2p2l38fujfpqupd8q06huicpfn2qa_at_4ax.com>


"David" <davidbl_at_iinet.net.au> wrote:

[snip]

>As it turns out I've made significant progress in the OT approach - and
>I believe the case is compelling. My solution is fast, simple, very
>efficient and highly scalable. I haven't published any of these
>results and I don't mind (nor am I surprised) if you don't believe me.
>
>If you think the prior work proves me wrong then please summarise the
>argument or cite the relevant material. Don't be like Bob and
>reference an entire book. That is rude and makes me wonder whether Bob
>actually has a specific argument at all.

     The burden of proof is on you. You are making the assertion that your system is better. Prove it. Why should we do your work for you?

[snip]

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:

     I have preferences.
     You have biases.
     He/She has prejudices.
Received on Fri Dec 15 2006 - 19:17:26 CET

Original text of this message