Re: Concurrency in an RDB

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:19:35 GMT
Message-ID: <rSlgh.33065$cz.493887@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>

Marshall wrote:

> On Dec 14, 3:22 pm, "Cimode" <cim..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>

>>I have never stated that locks put on objects can not cause deadlocks
>>to happen.

>
> So your position is:
>
> 1) There is NO direct relationship between locks and deadlocks.
> 2) Locks put on objects can cause deadlocks.
>
> Well. The More You Know.
>
>
>

>>A lock is a normal mechanism and is not the real
>>cause of the deadlock problem which lies more on the  IO/disk swapping
>>contention of ressources.  A matter of perspective, idiots like
>>Marshall will probably not perceive in a lifetime.

>
> Deadlock is caused by disk swapping, you say? You are
> right; I do not see me being able to perceive this any
> time soon.

Not even with the Romper Room magic looking glass! I see Cimode! And Neo! And... Received on Thu Dec 14 2006 - 18:19:35 CST