Re: Generalised approach to storing address details
From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:41:27 GMT
Message-ID: <b1ggh.32902$cz.488389_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
>
> I've never had to program a BOM application, and I've read about them
> only a little. I'm not qualified to have an opinion on BOM
> specifically.
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:41:27 GMT
Message-ID: <b1ggh.32902$cz.488389_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>
Marshall wrote:
> On Dec 14, 7:26 am, "Neo" <neo55..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
[snip]
>>>Trees do have their uses. They can be a good fit for when nodes have >>>no particular relationship with each other... >> >>So a hierarchal interface would not be a good fit for BOMs since parts >>has a particular relationship with each other? Do you prefer the list >>or table interface for BOMs? Could you show how you would like a car >>BOM to be displayed?
>
> I've never had to program a BOM application, and I've read about them
> only a little. I'm not qualified to have an opinion on BOM
> specifically.
BOM's are not hierarchies, BTW. The general BOM is a DAG. Received on Thu Dec 14 2006 - 18:41:27 CET