Re: Concurrency in an RDB

From: <monarodan_at_gmail.com>
Date: 13 Dec 2006 16:07:16 -0800
Message-ID: <1166054836.321807.245750@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com>

Bob Badour wrote:

> We can
> > only assume that your ideas of using OT actually work and scale well;
>
> Why would we assume that? See
> http://research.microsoft.com/research/pubs/view.aspx?msr_tr_id=P115
>

Because David claims that his research overcomes the problems faced by the microsoft approach.

If you have already assumed that the "Update anywhere-anytime-anyway" approach can not be implemented, then you best stay out of this conversation. I for one am most interested in seeing if David can back up his claims.

Wouldn't it be funny if this "crank idiot" was actually onto something. Bob - when David's approach ends up being proven to work, will you eat your hat? Received on Wed Dec 13 2006 - 18:07:16 CST