Re: Generalised approach to storing address details

From: Neo <neo55592_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 12 Dec 2006 10:37:11 -0800
Message-ID: <1165948631.169815.66290_at_f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>


> > Parent(x,y)
>
> The above violates the implied intent of the Information Principle. It
> is implicitly encoding information that is not explicitly expressed by
> relations' tuples' attributes' values. It also violates POOD, according
> to Bob Badour. For more details, see earlier response to your "Because
> we know he won't read it of course."

Sorry, "Parent(x,y)" itself does not violate IP or POOD. I was assuming you will be encoding it as follows which does.

Table1
Parent Child
x y Received on Tue Dec 12 2006 - 19:37:11 CET

Original text of this message