Re: Generalised approach to storing address details
From: Neo <neo55592_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 9 Dec 2006 21:23:51 -0800
Message-ID: <1165728231.358584.123920_at_l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com>
Date: 9 Dec 2006 21:23:51 -0800
Message-ID: <1165728231.358584.123920_at_l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com>
> I'd say that any data
> model besides the well-described relational one (not that I'm suggesting
> another one) would be right to follow the IP, otherwise it is hiding
> information which seems crazy to me. That way people don't have to
> memorize what a particular product does under such and such a
> circumstance, which would open the door for all the cuckoo arbitary
> behaviours that the products Codd was railing against.
If so, how would you structure it so that it doesn't. Received on Sun Dec 10 2006 - 06:23:51 CET