Re: FoxPro vs. SQL

From: ec <wavesoft_at_netvision.net.il>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 05:25:31 -0800
Message-ID: <eiva85$qpk$1_at_news2.netvision.net.il>


There is also TurboDelphi which is a free version of delphi .
You can use it as the dfront end .
Enjoy
ec

"Paul" <paul_at_see.my.sig.com> ???
??????:du8pk2dlto3sl4lon6k57efsv5jnuft4ei_at_4ax.com...
>
>
>
> "Alex S" <asluiter_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> My company uses a FoxPro database right now as an interface
>> and a database. For our situation, I have come to the conclusion that
>> it would be a better choice for us to move to an SQL server of some
>> sort.
>
>
> There are several things that would help us provide an answer.
>
> Volumes of data. Number of transactions per second/hour/day. Preferred
> operating system. Deficiencies of your present system - what are they?
> How do they impact on your business? How much RAM does your server
> have? Current server configuration. Do you have hardware plans also?
>
>
> My own personal choice would be to invest in Dephi as the front end
> and then use Firebird and/or PostgreSQL as the backend. Both of these
> open source dbs will run on minimal hardware and a variety of
> operating systems and are very powerful and have paid support
> available if required, often by the very people who write the dbs in
> the first place.
>
>
> There are any number of free development environments out there also.
>
>
> Paul...
>
>
>
>> Alex
>
>
> --
>
> plinehan __at__ yahoo __dot__ __com__
>
> XP Pro, SP 2,
>
> Oracle, 9.2.0.1.0 (Enterprise Ed.)
> Interbase 6.0.1.0;
>
> When asking database related questions, please give other posters
> some clues, like operating system, version of db being used and DDL.
> The exact text and/or number of error messages is useful (!= "it didn't
> work!").
> Thanks.
>
> Furthermore, as a courtesy to those who spend
> time analysing and attempting to help, please
> do not top post.
Received on Thu Nov 09 2006 - 14:25:31 CET

Original text of this message