Re: Basic question?What 's the key if there 's no FD(Functional Dependencies)?

From: vldm10 <vldm10_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 6 Nov 2006 08:55:12 -0800
Message-ID: <1162832112.773071.55160@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

NENASHI, Tegiri wrote:
> vldm10 wrote:
> [...]
> > as far as I understand math a relation doesn't have meaninig
>
> Is it that you are serious ? The relation is a set. You do not
> comprehend what the set is ?
>
> --
> Tegi

don't think that the comprehension is the same as meaning.

Vladimir Odrljin Received on Mon Nov 06 2006 - 10:55:12 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: NENASHI, Tegiri: "Re: Basic question?What 's the key if there 's no FD(Functional Dependencies)?"
Previous message: NENASHI, Tegiri: "Re: Basic question?What 's the key if there 's no FD(Functional Dependencies)?"
In reply to: NENASHI, Tegiri: "Re: Basic question?What 's the key if there 's no FD(Functional Dependencies)?"
Next in thread: NENASHI, Tegiri: "Re: Basic question?What 's the key if there 's no FD(Functional Dependencies)?"
Reply: NENASHI, Tegiri: "Re: Basic question?What 's the key if there 's no FD(Functional Dependencies)?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US