Re: SQL For Smarties 3rd Edition - ATTN Joe Celko

From: Aloha Kakuikanu <aloha.kakuikanu_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 29 Oct 2006 18:34:58 -0800
Message-ID: <1162175698.085948.160980_at_f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

Jay Dee wrote:
> Chris Howarth wrote:
> > Hi there
> >
> > This message is for Joe Celko - I thought this might be the best way to
> > get in touch.

Or yeah. You have no idea how to google "Joe Celko" and get his email address for private communication?

> Maybe not. Celko seems to have little use for database theory.

Ah, you are missing dbdebunk, didn't you? Go ahead post your opinion on amazon, but, sincerely, personal attacks is not the best way to contribute to the theory either. Received on Mon Oct 30 2006 - 03:34:58 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: dawn: "Re: Modeling Data for XML instead of SQL-DBMS"
Previous message: J M Davitt: "Re: Basic question?What 's the key if there 's no FD(Functional Dependencies)?"
In reply to: Jay Dee: "Re: SQL For Smarties 3rd Edition - ATTN Joe Celko"
In reply to Chris Howarth: "SQL For Smarties 3rd Edition - ATTN Joe Celko"
Next in thread: -CELKO-: "Re: SQL For Smarties 3rd Edition - ATTN Joe Celko"
Reply: -CELKO-: "Re: SQL For Smarties 3rd Edition - ATTN Joe Celko"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message