Re: Modeling Data for XML instead of SQL-DBMS

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:12:21 GMT
Message-ID: <9a61h.12037$cz.193293@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>

J M Davitt wrote:

> Bob Badour wrote:
>

>> J M Davitt wrote:
>>
>>> David Cressey wrote:
>>>
>>>> "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:1161897452.953712.279360_at_i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>>> David Cressey wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:1161893884.428842.156110_at_m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>

>
> [snip]
>

>>
>> What a self-congratulating idiot. Do you really have to inflict this 
>> stuff on us? If you just cannot stop yourself from replying to her 
>> nonsense, can you not at least snip out the self-congratulatory bullshit?

>
>
> "Honey, I love you, but..."
>
> [Sounds like a line from the Jerry Springer Show, doesn't it?]
>
> Actually, I didn't respond to DW's "nonsense" but to DC's post
> in which he hinted at a practiced technique for delivering product.
> I tried to explain why I don't think going "directly from CDM
> to PDM" is a good idea and that the PDM shouldn't be the final
> work product.
>
> Self-congratulating? No, these ideas aren't mine. Idiot? Maybe so...

Dawn is the self-congratulating idiot. Received on Sun Oct 29 2006 - 12:12:21 CST