Re: Modeling Data for XML instead of SQL-DBMS

Bob Badour wrote:
> J M Davitt wrote:
>

>> David Cressey wrote:
>>
>>> "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1161897452.953712.279360_at_i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>> David Cressey wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:1161893884.428842.156110_at_m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>

[snip]

>
> What a self-congratulating idiot. Do you really have to inflict this
> stuff on us? If you just cannot stop yourself from replying to her
> nonsense, can you not at least snip out the self-congratulatory bullshit?

"Honey, I love you, but..."

[Sounds like a line from the Jerry Springer Show, doesn't it?]

Actually, I didn't respond to DW's "nonsense" but to DC's post in which he hinted at a practiced technique for delivering product. I tried to explain why I don't think going "directly from CDM to PDM" is a good idea and that the PDM shouldn't be the final work product.

Self-congratulating? No, these ideas aren't mine. Idiot? Maybe so... Received on Sat Oct 28 2006 - 04:15:25 CEST