Re: Proposal: 6NF

From: JOG <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk>
Date: 23 Oct 2006 02:09:52 -0700
Message-ID: <1161594592.421873.24750@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>

In a desperate attempt to make any sense of this now vandalized thread, I have a question:

In comparing 2 and 2.0 might it be appropriate to say that are subject to an equivalency relation, but not an identity relation, and if so what are the consequences of this to the previous (non-inflammatory) discussion? Received on Mon Oct 23 2006 - 04:09:52 CDT