Re: Proposal: 6NF
From: Marshall <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: 21 Oct 2006 11:02:31 -0700
Message-ID: <1161453751.676677.242690_at_m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
Date: 21 Oct 2006 11:02:31 -0700
Message-ID: <1161453751.676677.242690_at_m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
On Oct 21, 9:57 am, "Keith H Duggar" <dug..._at_alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> > You have to construct all the real numbers and prove that
> > 2 is an element of the set.Any mathematical number construct that fails to equate 2.0
> and 2, fails to model our most basic common sense or
> "elemntary school" concept of the number 2.
Nicely put! I kept trying to come at it from various oblique angles, but you just hit the nail on the head directly.
Marshall Received on Sat Oct 21 2006 - 20:02:31 CEST