Re: Proposal: 6NF

vc wrote:
> Jan Hidders wrote:
> > In fact, most mathematicians that I've talked to in my
> > career on this issue don't agree with you, and those are
> > not only the mathematicians that happen to work in my
> > own department.
>
> Are you saying that the mathematicians you talked to claim
> that the closure property under some operation is no
> longer required for, e.g. a group to be called a group?

He said absolutely nothing of the kind, idiot.

> Did those mathematicians attend a primary school where
> they might have learned that integers were invented in
> order for subtraction to be defined for all the numbers as
> opposed to natural numbers where this is not the case?

Time to rant, Val? Is that what you resort to when you are so far beyond your intellectual capacity?

> The only logical conclusion would be that you talked to
> impostors.

LOL. You know, Val, for a pretend mathematician you really are not very bright. Stop trying, it's hopeless.

Keith -- Fraud 6 Received on Fri Oct 20 2006 - 03:10:07 CEST