Re: Proposal: 6NF

Cimode wrote:
> Jan Hidders wrote:
> > Cimode wrote:
> > > Jan Hidders wrote:
> > > > And in addition you attribute an opinion to me that I never uttered,
> > > > and in fact explicitly denied complete with an exact explanation of why
> > > > so (message ID available on request)!
> > > I request. Show where did you state that NULL is not a value and that
> > > empty set is not NULL.
> >
> > http://groups.google.be/group/comp.databases.theory/msg/9cde17e40781c251?hl=en&
> Stating that SQL NULLS do not treat NULL as a value is NOT the same
> thing as stating that SQL NULL is not a value. One refers to a
> resulting behavior while the other refers to an definition.

Cimode this is silly - if you've read any of Jan's posts you will know he is more than aware of the nature of NULLs. We all make mistakes, and in this case it would be good to have the grace to acknowledge it.

>
> Stop jerking into mental masturbation...idiot
>
> > Now, if you'll excuse me, I've already exceeded my Troll-feeding quota,
> > so I'll go back to ignoring you.
> How practical...
>
> My initial comment was directed at Keith- Bullshit-Duggar (Fraud 6)
> about the silly formulation of about domain of output values. As you
> seem to stand by it and even taking pride in it demanding to become
> Fraud 7, you arrogantly decided to assume such position but without
> proving any of it.
>
> What else to expect from a moron who asserts bullshits such as
> REALS/REALS produces REALS and requires to produce additional
> operators to sustain his dreamy theory...
>
> You are nothing but a paradigm blinded moron...
Received on Mon Oct 16 2006 - 16:42:48 CEST