Re: Efficient way of global concurrency control/serializability in federated databases??

On Oct 10, 12:59 pm, mishad_w..._at_hotmail.com wrote:
> > Word on the street is that the world is giving up on two phase commit.
> > Although I'm not sure I agree, I can see some of the motivations.
> > The thing that bothers me, though, is that any potential replacements
> > are necessarily application-specific, and can't be handled in a
> > fully automatic way.Do you mean undo via compensating actions? (which I think is the
> WS-Transaction/BPEL4WS approach)

Yes, exactly. It's not something I know anything about, and I'm wondering if there are some canonical papers or other reading to do on the topic.

Marshall Received on Tue Oct 10 2006 - 23:15:25 CEST