Re: Proposal: 6NF
From: Cimode <cimode_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 8 Oct 2006 13:24:03 -0700
Message-ID: <1160339043.563247.39400_at_e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
Date: 8 Oct 2006 13:24:03 -0700
Message-ID: <1160339043.563247.39400_at_e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
Marshall wrote:
[Snipped]
It seems quite clear that debate is about SQL NULLS and the miserable treatment of missing data they represent...One thing leading to another, some idiots still believe that a SQL NULLS represent a value while it was demonstrated to them that it does not fit the classical definition of a value being the output of a predetermined algebric function...To make a case, people like dawn are willing to set up their own definition of mathematical functions to try to prove anything...They are confused and confusers...What a shame she teaches such bulshit to her student...
A pure waste of time... Received on Sun Oct 08 2006 - 22:24:03 CEST