Re: Proposal: 6NF
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 04:37:05 GMT
Message-ID: <R9GVg.101754$1T2.66321_at_pd7urf2no>
> NULLS should not be *dismissed* is not the right word. I prefer *dealt
> with*...
>
> Regards
>> p
>
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 04:37:05 GMT
Message-ID: <R9GVg.101754$1T2.66321_at_pd7urf2no>
Cimode wrote:
> paul c wrote:
>> David Cressey wrote: >>> ... >>> I also agree with the above, that nulls should not be dismissed arbitrarily. >>> ... >> Right, they should be dismissed on logical grounds.
> NULLS should not be *dismissed* is not the right word. I prefer *dealt
> with*...
>
> Regards
>> p
>
Bloody hell.
p Received on Sat Oct 07 2006 - 06:37:05 CEST