Re: A statement on dbdebunk.

From: Keith H Duggar <duggar_at_alum.mit.edu>
Date: 20 Aug 2006 00:04:51 -0700
Message-ID: <1156057491.361079.140810@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>

Frank Hamersley wrote:
> Keith H Duggar wrote:
> >
> > It seems the only slop so far (and it's in this thread) has
> > been the assumption of isomorphism. 1:1 != isomorphic.
>
> Pray tell how you reached this stunning conclusion! I'm
> all eyes!

Huh? What "stunning conclusion"?

Perhaps you did not read my previous response to Erwin? Read that. Then restate your question (if one remains) using more specific language.

Keith -- Fraud 6

Received on Sun Aug 20 2006 - 02:04:51 CDT