Re: Why bother with Logical data model?

From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_ucantrade.com.NOTHERE>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:31:24 -0700
Message-ID: <54rmd2put5scmd9mka66ij72c10g5fam38@4ax.com>

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:22:20 GMT, Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:

>JOG wrote:
>
>> I have just invented a new layer called the 'conceptalogical layer'.
>> It's meaningless obviously but sounds like just the sort of thing I
>> could build a software business on. It's a winner I tell you
>> </cynicism>
>
>It's going to have a tough time competing against my new logceptysical
>model. Let's see who gets the book deal first! ;)

My money is on JOG. His term is easy to say. Yours is awkward.

I take that back. *MY* model is better. I call it "Conilogisal". In accordance with the first syllable, I am prepared to accept bribes in order to leave the market to the two of you. Please be generous.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko Received on Thu Aug 10 2006 - 12:31:24 CDT