Re: Resiliency To New Data Requirements

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:57:45 GMT
Message-ID: <dkRBg.36509$pu3.479885@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>

David Cressey wrote:

> "Neo" <neo55592_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1154968099.257427.212440_at_i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>

>>>My suggestion for most general uses only a single concept: set.
>>
>>In my search for the most general method of representing things, it
>>appears I may have re-invented via trial and error what is essentially
>>the basic part of lambda calculus and set theory. What lambda calculus
>>calls expression, and what set theory calls set, is what I have been
>>calling thing. Thing is the general form of all things.

>
> My sweet lord!
>
> Neo has discovered that everything is a thing! This seems to be the
> ultimate "theory of everything" (T.O.E.)

Don't you mean the BIG theory of everything? (BIG T.O.E. ?) Received on Mon Aug 07 2006 - 19:57:45 CDT