Re: computational model of transactions

Bob Badour wrote:
> ...
>
> There is nothing intermediate about it. I think you are talking about
> splitting logical unit of work into multiple units of work, which is
> something entirely different. Your comment suggests to me you have
> worked with Oracle and it's, ahem, wasteful and unforgiving use of
> rollback segments.
> ...

First time I've heard it suggested I knew anything about Oracle. Not flattered.

p Received on Tue Aug 01 2006 - 18:47:02 CDT