comp.databases.theory: by date

Saturday, 1 July 2006
- Re: No exceptions? Jon Heggland
- Re: What databases have taught me Marshall
- Re: No exceptions? Jon Heggland
- Re: What databases have taught me Keith H Duggar
- Re: What databases have taught me Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: What databases have taught me Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Re: No exceptions? paul c
- Re: No exceptions? Bob Badour
- Re: What databases have taught me Marshall
- Re: No exceptions? paul c
- Re: No exceptions? paul c
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Tony D
- Re: No exceptions? Bob Badour
- Re: No exceptions? Bob Badour
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Tony D
- Re: What databases have taught me Marshall
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Tony D
- Re: What databases have taught me Keith H Duggar
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Tony D
- Re: What databases have taught me Marshall
- Re: Bags vs. Sets vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me Keith H Duggar
- Re: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Re: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me Chris Smith
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Marshall
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Re: What databases have taught me Keith H Duggar
- Re: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Re: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Re: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Refactoring state machines (Was a bunch of other stuff...) Leslie Sanford
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me David Barrett-Lennard
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me frebe73_at_gmail.com
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me frebe73_at_gmail.com
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Keith H Duggar
- Re: What databases have taught me Dmitry A. Kazakov
- RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) mAsterdam
- Re: What databases have taught me Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count mAsterdam
- Re: What databases have taught me Keith H Duggar
- Re: What databases have taught me Christian Brunschen
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Dmitry A. Kazakov
- QRe: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Michael Gaab
- Re: Just for the record David Cressey
- Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene Cimode
- Re: Fraud Number 3: U-Gene Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me Tony D
- Re: OO versus RDB H. S. Lahman
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Ron Jeffries
- Re: OO versus RDB H. S. Lahman
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Michael Gaab
- Re: No exceptions? paul c
- Re: OO versus RDB H. S. Lahman
- Re: RM's Canonical database paul c
- Re: What databases have taught me Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: No exceptions? J M Davitt
- Re: OO versus RDB H. S. Lahman
- Re: RM's Canonical database J M Davitt
- Re: What databases have taught me H. S. Lahman
- Re: No exceptions? Jon Heggland
- Re: Just for the record Marshall
- Re: No exceptions? Jon Heggland
- Re: OO versus RDB Marshall
- Re: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Re: RM's Canonical database paul c
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Marshall
- Re: QRe: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Re: RM's Canonical database Bob Badour
- Re: RM's Canonical database Bob Badour
- Re: What databases have taught me Marshall
- Re: No exceptions? Marshall
- Re: What databases have taught me Keith H Duggar
- Re: RM's Canonical database Bob Badour
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count is now an amazing 19! Andrew McDonagh
- Re: What databases have taught me Marshall
- Re: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Chris Smith
- Re: RM's Canonical database Marshall
- Re: What databases have taught me Keith H Duggar
- Re: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Re: RM's Canonical database Bob Badour
- Re: RM's Canonical database paul c
- Re: No exceptions? Bob Badour
- Re: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Re: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Re: Just for the record Bob Badour
- Re: What databases have taught me Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: RM's Canonical database paul c
- Re: No exceptions? Rich Ryan
- Re: No exceptions? J M Davitt
Sunday, 2 July 2006
- Re: No exceptions? Bob Badour
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me topmind
- Re: OO versus RDB topmind
- Re: RM's Canonical database Frans Bouma
- Re: RM's Canonical database Andrew McDonagh
- Re: OO versus RDB Frans Bouma
- Re: OO versus RDB frebe73_at_gmail.com
- Re: Just for the record Roy Hann
- Re: Just for the record David Cressey
- Re: Just for the record David Cressey
- Re: OO versus RDB H. S. Lahman
- Re: Lazy summer project: build a basketball app. Kenneth Downs
- Re: sql-99 array type Kenneth Downs
- Re: sql-99 array type David Cressey
- Re: OO versus RDB Kenneth Downs
- Re: OO versus RDB frebe73_at_gmail.com
- Re: No exceptions? paul c
- Re: No exceptions? Bob Badour
- Re: OO versus RDB Bob Badour
- Re: No exceptions? paul c
- Re: Possible bridges between OO programming proponents and relational model Cimode
Monday, 3 July 2006
- Re: OO versus RDB mAsterdam
- Re: No exceptions? Bob Badour
- Re: OO versus RDB paul c
- Re: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me Chris Smith
- Re: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me Marshall
- Re: RM's Canonical database Dan
- Re: OO versus RDB Bob Badour
- Re: RM's Canonical database Bob Badour
- Re: OO versus RDB J M Davitt
- Re: No exceptions? paul c
- Re: RM's Canonical database guntermann_at_verizon.net
- Re: No exceptions? Jon Heggland
- Re: RM's Canonical database Frans Bouma
- Re: What databases have taught me frebe73_at_gmail.com
- Re: What databases have taught me Bruno Desthuilliers
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Bruno Desthuilliers
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Bruno Desthuilliers
- Re: Unpredictable programming Bruno Desthuilliers
- Re: No exceptions? Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me Bruno Desthuilliers
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Ron Jeffries
- Re: No exceptions? Erwin
- Re: No exceptions? Erwin
- Re: No exceptions? Erwin
- Re: RM's Canonical database J M Davitt
- Re: RM's Canonical database Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: No exceptions? Bob Badour
- Re: RM's Canonical database Bob Badour
- Re: No exceptions? Jon Heggland
- Re: What databases have taught me Cimode
- Re: RM's Canonical database Marshall
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Marshall
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Alfredo Novoa
- Re: RM's Canonical database Dan
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Ed Prochak
- Re: RM's Canonical database Dan
- Re: No exceptions? Bob Badour
- Re: RM's Canonical database Bob Badour
- Re: What databases have taught me Marshall
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Cimode
- Re: RM's Canonical database Marshall
- Re: What databases have taught me Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: RM's Canonical database Dan
- Re: RM's Canonical database Bob Badour
- A game of Bob Bingo anyone? Was: RM's Canonical database AndrewMackDonna
- Re: RM's Canonical database AndrewMackDonna
- Re: RM's Canonical database AndrewMackDonna
- Re: RM's Canonical database Marshall
- Re: RM's Canonical database Dan
- OT: A game of Bob Bingo anyone? Marshall
- Re: OT: A game of Bob Bingo anyone? AndrewMackDonna
- Re: RM's Canonical database AndrewMackDonna
- Re: RM's Canonical database Bob Badour
- Re: RM's Canonical database AndrewMackDonna
- Re: RM's Canonical database Marshall
- Re: RM's Canonical database Marshall
- Re: RM's Canonical database Cimode
- Re: RM's Canonical database AndrewMackDonna
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Bob Badour
- Re: help me please Bob Badour
- Re: A game of Bob Bingo anyone? Was: RM's Canonical database Roy Hann
- Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me Cimode
- Re: RM's Canonical database Bob Badour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Neo
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Neo
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Neo
- Re: What databases have taught me Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Neo
- Re: What databases have taught me Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Neo
- Re: What databases have taught me Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me Marshall
- Re: What databases have taught me Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Neo
- Re: Fraud Number 6: Keith H Duggar Cimode
- Re: Fraud Number 4: Bob Badour Cimode
- Re: RM's Canonical database Marshall
- Re: What databases have taught me topmind
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Neo
- Re: What databases have taught me Marshall
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me Marshall
- Re: What databases have taught me AndrewMackDonna
- Re: What databases have taught me topmind
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: What databases have taught me Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
Tuesday, 4 July 2006
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models) topmind
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Bill Karwin
- Re: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Bob Badour
- Re: Unpredictable programming Gene Wirchenko
- Re: What databases have taught me Marshall
- Re: RM's Canonical database Marshall
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Ron Jeffries
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Ron Jeffries
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Ron Jeffries
- Re: RM's Canonical database paul c
- Re: RM's Canonical database Bob Badour
- Re: RM's Canonical database Bob Badour
- Re: What databases have taught me Keith H Duggar
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Marshall
- Re: OO versus RDB topmind
- Re: OO versus RDB topmind
- Re: What databases have taught me Cimode
- Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models) Patrick May
- Re: OO versus RDB topmind
- Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models) topmind
- Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models) topmind
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models) Patrick May
- Re: No exceptions? Jon Heggland
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Erwin
- comms standards (Was: What databases have taught me) S Perryman
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Bill Karwin
- Re: What databases have taught me Marshall
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Cimode
- Re: No exceptions? Erwin
- Re: What databases have taught me Frans Bouma
- Re: No exceptions? Jon Heggland
- Re: What databases have taught me Bruno Desthuilliers
- Re: RM's Canonical database Bruno Desthuilliers
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Bruno Desthuilliers
- Re: OO versus RDB J M Davitt
- Re: sql-99 array type Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Cimode
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) David Cressey
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Cimode
- Re: comms standards (Was: What databases have taught me) Bob Badour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Bob Badour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Bob Badour
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me frebe73_at_gmail.com
- Re: comms standards (Was: What databases have taught me) S Perryman
- Re: OO versus RDB H. S. Lahman
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Marshall
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: OO versus RDB Marshall
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Cimode
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Bruno Desthuilliers
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Tony D
- Re: OO versus RDB mAsterdam
- Re: What databases have taught me AndrewMackDonna
- TSD 2006 - Call for Demonstrations and Participation TSD 2006
- Re: comms standards (Was: What databases have taught me) AndrewMackDonna
Wednesday, 5 July 2006
- Re: Example of expression bias? Bruno Desthuilliers
- Re: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me Laurent Bossavit
- Re: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Ron Jeffries
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Ron Jeffries
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me Frans Bouma
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me Laurent Bossavit
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Cimode
- SQL for presentation frebe73_at_gmail.com
- Re: SQL for presentation Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me frebe73_at_gmail.com
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: SQL for presentation Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Cimode
- Re: SQL for presentation Bob Badour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: SQL for presentation Kenneth Downs
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: SQL for presentation J M Davitt
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Cimode
- Re: OO versus RDB H. S. Lahman
- Re: OO versus RDB Rene_de_Visser_at_hotmail.com
- Re: OO versus RDB H. S. Lahman
- Re: What databases have taught me Marshall
- Re: What databases have taught me Marshall
- Re: OO versus RDB Marshall
- Re: OO versus RDB topmind
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Ed Prochak
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me Laurent Bossavit
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: What databases have taught me frebe73_at_gmail.com
- Re: OO versus RDB mAsterdam
- Re: SQL for presentation Neo
- Re: SQL for presentation Bruno Desthuilliers
- Re: What databases have taught me frebe73_at_gmail.com
- Re: SQL for presentation frebe73_at_gmail.com
- Re: SQL for presentation frebe73_at_gmail.com
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: SQL for presentation frebe73_at_gmail.com
- Re: OO versus RDB Gene Wirchenko
- Re: SQL for presentation Kenneth Downs
- Re: SQL for presentation frebe73_at_gmail.com
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Gene Wirchenko
Thursday, 6 July 2006
- Re: SQL for presentation Bob Badour
- Re: SQL for presentation Bob Badour
- Re: SQL for presentation frebe73_at_gmail.com
- Re: SQL for presentation Bob Badour
- Re: SQL for presentation J M Davitt
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me topmind
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Ron Jeffries
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Ron Jeffries
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Cimode
- Re: SQL for presentation Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me Frans Bouma
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Frans Bouma
- Re: SQL for presentation frebe73_at_gmail.com
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Josip Almasi
- Re: SQL for presentation Kenneth Downs
- Re: SQL for presentation frebe73_at_gmail.com
- Re: OO versus RDB Daniel Parker
- Re: SQL for presentation Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Cimode
- Re: SQL for presentation Bob Badour
- Re: SQL for presentation frebe73_at_gmail.com
- Re: OO versus RDB S Perryman
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: SQL for presentation Bob Badour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Josip Almasi
- Re: SQL for presentation Marshall
- Re: OO versus RDB Daniel Parker
- Re: OO versus RDB Marshall
- Re: OO versus RDB topmind
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: SQL for presentation Bob Badour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Cimode
- Re: OO versus RDB Bob Badour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Select enumeration of intergers frebe73_at_gmail.com
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models) Robert Martin
- Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models) Robert Martin
- Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models) Robert Martin
- Re: OO versus RDB H. S. Lahman
- Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models) topmind
- Re: OO versus RDB H. S. Lahman
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Chris Smith
- Re: Select enumeration of intergers vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: OO versus RDB Daniel Parker
- Re: OO versus RDB Daniel Parker
- Re: Select enumeration of intergers Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside B Faux
- Re: SQL for presentation Bruno Desthuilliers
- Re: SQL for presentation Bruno Desthuilliers
- A good book Chris Smith
- Re: A good book Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Ed Prochak
Friday, 7 July 2006
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Bob Badour
- Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Re: A good book Bob Badour
- Re: A good book Chris Smith
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Ron Jeffries
- Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models) Robert Martin
- Re: The wisdom of the object mentors (Was: Searching OO Associations with RDBMS Persistence Models) topmind
- Re: A good book Cimode
- Re: SQL for presentation Cimode
- Re: A good book Marshall
- Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: OO versus RDB S Perryman
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me David Cressey
- Re: Select enumeration of intergers Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: A good book Cimode
- Re: A good book Roy Hann
- Re: A good book Cimode
- Re: A good book Roy Hann
- Re: A good book Bob Badour
- Re: A good book Anith Sen
- Re: A good book Alvin Ryder
- Re: A good book Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Josip Almasi
- Re: A good book HungryLion
- Re: A good book Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Josip Almasi
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Bob Badour
- Re: OO versus RDB Marshall
- Re: A good book Tony D
- Re: OO versus RDB Adrian Hey
- Re: A good book Chris Smith
- Re: A good book Cimode
- Re: A good book Bob Badour
- Re: A good book Chris Smith
- Re: A good book Cimode
- Re: OO versus RDB Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: Select enumeration of intergers paul c
- Re: Select enumeration of intergers vadimtro_at_gmail.com
- Re: OO versus RDB paul c
- Re: SQL for presentation Kenneth Downs
- Re: OO versus RDB Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Ed Prochak
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Ed Prochak
- Re: OO versus RDB Marshall
Saturday, 8 July 2006
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Bob Badour
- Re: A good book Chris Smith
- Re: A good book paul c
- Re: A good book Chris Smith
- Re: A good book Bob Badour
- Re: A good book Chris Smith
- Re: A good book Bob Badour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Marshall
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Bob Badour
- Re: A good book Chris Smith
- Re: A good book Marshall
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Marshall
- Re: A good book paul c
- Re: A good book paul c
- Re: A good book Chris Smith
- Re: A good book Bob Badour
- Re: A good book Bob Badour
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Ron Jeffries
- Re: A good book paul c
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Bob Badour
- Re: A good book Bob Badour
- Re: A good book paul c
- Re: A good book Chris Smith
- Re: A good book paul c
- Re: A good book Chris Smith
- Re: A good book J M Davitt
- Re: A good book Chris Smith
- Re: A good book Chris Smith
- Re: A good book Bruce Baker
- Re: A good book Marshall
- Re: What databases have taught me topmind
- Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count) Cimode
- Re: A good book Dan
- Re: A good book Tony D
- Re: A good book J M Davitt
- Re: A good book Bob Badour
- Re: A good book Bob Badour
- Re: A good book Bob Badour
- Re: OO versus RDB H. S. Lahman
- Re: A good book J M Davitt
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: What databases have taught me topmind
- Re: OO versus RDB Daniel Parker
Sunday, 9 July 2006
- Re: Select enumeration of intergers Alvin Ryder
- Re: What databases have taught me Tony D
- Re: What databases have taught me topmind
- Re: What databases have taught me Tony D
- Re: What databases have taught me J M Davitt
- Re: What databases have taught me topmind
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Jonathan Leffler
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Re: OO versus RDB Adrian Hey
- Re: What databases have taught me Tony D
- Re: OO versus RDB Tony D
- Re: OO versus RDB Cimode
- Re: OO versus RDB Marshall
- Re: OO versus RDB Bob Badour
- Testing relational databases Phlip
- Re: Testing relational databases Bob Badour
- Re: OO versus RDB Marshall
- Re: Testing relational databases JXStern
- Re: Testing relational databases AndrewMcDonagh
- Re: Testing relational databases Phlip
- Re: Testing relational databases Bob Badour
- Re: OO versus RDB Marshall
- Re: OO versus RDB Bob Badour
- Re: Testing relational databases Phlip
- Re: Testing relational databases Bob Badour
- Re: Testing relational databases Phlip
- Re: Testing relational databases Bob Badour
- Re: Testing relational databases Marshall
Monday, 10 July 2006
- Re: Testing relational databases Phlip
- Re: Testing relational databases Bob Badour
- Re: OO versus RDB Tony D
- Re: Testing relational databases Phlip
- Re: OO versus RDB Tony D
- Re: Testing relational databases AndrewMcDonagh
- Gray Hair is still relevant Rich Ryan
- Re: Testing relational databases AndrewMcDonagh
- Re: OO versus RDB Adrian Hey
- Re: Gray Hair is still relevant Neo
- Re: OO versus RDB Adrian Hey
- Re: OO versus RDB Tony D
- Re: Testing relational databases Bob Badour
- Re: Testing relational databases paul c
- Re: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: OO versus RDB Marshall
- Re: Testing relational databases Phlip
- Re: What databases have taught me paul c
- Re: Testing relational databases Bob Badour
- Re: Testing relational databases Phlip
- Re: Testing relational databases Phlip
- Re: OO versus RDB Marshall
- Re: Gray Hair is still relevant Neo
- Re: OO versus RDB Chris Smith
- Re: What databases have taught me topmind
- Re: A good book Chris Smith
- Re: What databases have taught me Cimode
- Re: Gray Hair is still relevant Cimode
- Re: A good book Cimode
- Re: Select enumeration of intergers Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Ed Prochak
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Josip Almasi
- Re: Testing relational databases Bob Badour
- Re: Testing relational databases Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Bob Badour
- Re: Select enumeration of intergers Marshall
- Re: Testing relational databases S Perryman
- Re: A good book Chris Smith
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: A good book Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: Testing relational databases Tony D
- Re: Testing relational databases Marshall
- Re: Testing relational databases Phlip
- Re: Testing relational databases S Perryman
- Re: Testing relational databases Marshall
- Re: Testing relational databases Chris Smith
- Re: Testing relational databases S Perryman
- Re: Testing relational databases Tony D
- Re: Testing relational databases Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: Testing relational databases S Perryman
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Josip Almasi
- Re: Testing relational databases Chris Smith
- Re: Testing relational databases Marshall
- Re: Testing relational databases Dmitry A. Kazakov
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Testing relational databases Phlip
- Re: Testing relational databases Chris Smith
- Re: A good book Cimode
- Re: Testing relational databases Cimode
- Re: Testing relational databases Bob Badour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Bob Badour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Ed Prochak
- Re: A good book -CELKO-
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside U-gene
- Re: OO versus RDB Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Testing relational databases Robert Martin
- Re: Select enumeration of intergers Alvin Ryder
Tuesday, 11 July 2006
- Re: A good book Chris Smith
- Re: Testing relational databases S Perryman
- Re: A good book Keith H Duggar
- Keyword searching across 2 tables rgparkins_at_hotmail.com
- Re: Keyword searching across 2 tables Bob Badour
- Re: Testing relational databases S Perryman
- Re: Keyword searching across 2 tables Cimode
- Re: Keyword searching across 2 tables rgparkins_at_hotmail.com
- Re: A good book David Cressey
- Re: A good book David Cressey
- Re: What databases have taught me Bruno Desthuilliers
- Re: Testing relational databases Chris Smith
- Re: OO versus RDB Marshall
- Re: Testing relational databases Marshall
- Re: Testing relational databases Marshall
- Re: Testing relational databases Gene Wirchenko
- Re: OO versus RDB Gene Wirchenko
Wednesday, 12 July 2006
- Re: A good book J M Davitt
- Re: What databases have taught me topmind
- Boolean Query Algorithm Sherrie Laraurens
- Re: A good book David Cressey
- Re: Boolean Query Algorithm Cimode
- Re: Boolean Query Algorithm Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me Bruno Desthuilliers
- Re: What databases have taught me Bob Badour
- Re: What databases have taught me Bruno Desthuilliers
- Re: What databases have taught me topmind
- Re: What databases have taught me topmind
- Re: What databases have taught me Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me AndrewMcDonagh
Thursday, 13 July 2006
- Re: What databases have taught me Robert Martin
- Re: What databases have taught me AndrewMcDonagh
- Re: What databases have taught me Marshall
- Re: Boolean Query Algorithm Marshall
- Re: Boolean Query Algorithm Bob Stearns
- Re: Boolean Query Algorithm Sherrie Laraurens
- Re: Boolean Query Algorithm Sherrie Laraurens
- Re: Boolean Query Algorithm Bob Stearns
- Re: Boolean Query Algorithm Cimode
- Re: What databases have taught me Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Tony D
Friday, 14 July 2006
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) paul c
- Re: Keyword searching across 2 tables Carl Federl
- distinct subset query Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: distinct subset query vadimtro_at_gmail.com
Saturday, 15 July 2006
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: Testing relational databases Laurent Bossavit
- Re: Testing relational databases Marshall
Sunday, 16 July 2006
- views of binary operations Marshall
- Re: views of binary operations -CELKO-
- Re: distinct subset query -CELKO-
- Re: views of binary operations Bob Badour
- Re: views of binary operations Cimode
- Re: views of binary operations Cimode
- Re: views of binary operations Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Tony D
- Re: views of binary operations David Cressey
- Re: distinct subset query Tonkuma
- Re: views of binary operations Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: views of binary operations Marshall
- Re: views of binary operations Bob Badour
- Re: views of binary operations Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: Testing relational databases JXStern
- Re: Testing relational databases JXStern
- Re: views of binary operations Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: views of binary operations Bob Badour
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
Monday, 17 July 2006
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: views of binary operations erk
- Re: views of binary operations erk
- Re: views of binary operations erk
- Re: views of binary operations Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) erk
- Re: views of binary operations erk
- dbdebunk.com erk
- Re: views of binary operations Bob Badour
- Re: dbdebunk.com paul c
- Re: dbdebunk.com Bob Badour
- Re: views of binary operations paul c
- Re: Select enumeration of intergers Tonkuma
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: Gray Hair is still relevant Tonkuma
- Re: dbdebunk.com paul c
- Re: dbdebunk.com paul c
- Re: dbdebunk.com erk
- Re: dbdebunk.com paul c
- Re: views of binary operations Bob Badour
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) erk
- Re: Gray Hair is still relevant Bob Badour
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: views of binary operations paul c
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) erk
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: distinct subset query Aloha Kakuikanu
Tuesday, 18 July 2006
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Tony D
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Tony D
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Bob Badour
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Bob Badour
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Tony D
- Re: views of binary operations paul c
- a problem about database modeling dxuranus
- Re: views of binary operations Marshall
- Re: views of binary operations Marshall
- Re: views of binary operations Marshall
- Re: views of binary operations Marshall
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Josip Almasi
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Josip Almasi
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Bob Badour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Josip Almasi
- Re: views of binary operations David Cressey
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Aloha Kakuikanu
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside David Portas
Wednesday, 19 July 2006
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Tony D
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Nicholas King
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) erk
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Bob Badour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: a problem about database modeling Neo
- Re: a problem about database modeling Marshall
- Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Paul Mansour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Roy Hann
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Paul Mansour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Paul Mansour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Paul Mansour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Paul Mansour
- Re: Gray Hair is still relevant Dave Conrad
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Dmitry Shuklin
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Paul Mansour
- Re: Gray Hair is still relevant erk
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Ed Prochak
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) erk
- Re: a problem about database modeling Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Rich Ryan
Thursday, 20 July 2006
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Tony D
- A Combinatorics/Graph Theory Question mathlover
- Database design ideas or templates... romantercero_at_gmail.com
- SQL ... Order of operations with Logical Operators FRAN
- Re: Database design ideas or templates... Jay Dee
- Re: SQL ... Order of operations with Logical Operators Jay Dee
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Damien
- Re: SQL ... Order of operations with Logical Operators FRAN
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Roy Hann
- Re: a problem about database modeling dxuranus
- Re: Database design ideas or templates... David Cressey
- Re: views of binary operations David Cressey
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Damien
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
- Re: views of binary operations Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Paul Mansour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Paul Mansour
- Re: a problem about database modeling Neo
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Paul Mansour
- Re: Database design ideas or templates... romantercero_at_gmail.com
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) erk
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Josip Almasi
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Paul Mansour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Josip Almasi
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Ed Prochak
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Paul Mansour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside David Portas
Friday, 21 July 2006
- Technology Sourcing Solutions that work! itrelations_at_yahoo.com
- Re: Database design ideas or templates... Paul
- Re: Database design ideas or templates... Paul
- Re: Database design ideas or templates... Bob Badour
- Re: a problem about database modeling dxuranus
- Re: a problem about database modeling Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: a problem about database modeling Neo
- Re: SQL ... Order of operations with Logical Operators -CELKO-
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Dan
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Roy Hann
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Roy Hann
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside David Cressey
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Paul Mansour
- MVCC implementation Marshall
- Re: MVCC implementation Cimode
- Re: MVCC implementation Tony D
- Re: MVCC implementation vc
Saturday, 22 July 2006
- Re: MVCC implementation Alfredo Novoa
- Re: Database design ideas or templates... Paul
- Re: MVCC implementation Paul
- Re: Database design ideas or templates... Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- How will schemas be affected by nested relations? Marshall
- Re: MVCC implementation Dan
- Re: MVCC implementation Alfredo Novoa
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue David Cressey
- Re: Database design ideas or templates... David Cressey
- Re: MVCC implementation David Cressey
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue -CELKO-
- Re: MVCC implementation David Cressey
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
- Re: How will schemas be affected by nested relations? Bob Badour
- Re: MVCC implementation Cimode
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue David Cressey
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bernard Peek
Sunday, 23 July 2006
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue -CELKO-
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue -CELKO-
- One PostDoc position available beginning September 1, 2006 Jens Schulze
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Kenneth Downs
Monday, 24 July 2006
- Re: MVCC implementation Paul
- Re: Database design ideas or templates... dxuranus
- Re: MVCC implementation David Cressey
- Re: How will schemas be affected by nested relations? michael_at_preece.net
- Re: Database design ideas or templates... Kenneth Downs
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue -CELKO-
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Paul Mansour
- Re: How will schemas be affected by nested relations? dawn
- [ANNOUNCE] Unifying computing and cognition Gerry
- Re: How will schemas be affected by nested relations? Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Re: How will schemas be affected by nested relations? Neo
- Re: How will schemas be affected by nested relations? Neo
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue David Cressey
Tuesday, 25 July 2006
- Re: How will schemas be affected by nested relations? JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Jay Dee
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Jay Dee
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: How will schemas be affected by nested relations? paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
Wednesday, 26 July 2006
- (repost) cdt glossary 0.1.1 mAsterdam
- why hierarchy? JOG
- Re: why hierarchy? Bob Badour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Josip Almasi
- Re: why hierarchy? paul c
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? paul c
- Re: why hierarchy? paul c
- Re: why hierarchy? Joe Kesselman
- Re: why hierarchy? Marshall
- Re: why hierarchy? paul c
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? Tony D
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Tony D
- Re: why hierarchy? Bob Badour
- Re: why hierarchy? paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? Andy Dingley
- Re: why hierarchy? paul c
- Re: why hierarchy? JOG
- Re: why hierarchy? JOG
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? Marshall
- Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject) Cimode
- Re: why hierarchy? Cimode
- Re: why hierarchy? paul c
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? paul c
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? paul c
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? paul c
- Re: why hierarchy? Marshall
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? erk
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: MVCC implementation Paul Mansour
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside David Cressey
Thursday, 27 July 2006
- Re: why hierarchy? Jay Dee
- Re: why hierarchy? Keith H Duggar
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: Database design ideas or templates... romantercero_at_gmail.com
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? Kenneth Downs
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Techie Stuff ... writehere
- Re: why hierarchy? paul c
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside paul c
- Re: Database design ideas or templates... J M Davitt
- Re: why hierarchy? Marshall
- Re: why hierarchy? J M Davitt
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue J M Davitt
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Craig Alexander Morrison
- Re: Unpredictable programming raxitsheth2000_at_yahoo.co.in
- Establishing a relationship with the unknown michael_at_preece.net
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
- Re: why hierarchy? kvnkrkptrck_at_gmail.com
- Re: Establishing a relationship with the unknown Bob Badour
- Re: Establishing a relationship with the unknown michael_at_preece.net
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: Establishing a relationship with the unknown Kenneth Downs
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Anith Sen
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
- Re: model inherited object deja_at_2bytes.co.uk
- Re: Establishing a relationship with the unknown paul c
- Re: Establishing a relationship with the unknown B Faux
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? paul c
- Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside Ed Prochak
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? paul c
Friday, 28 July 2006
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: Establishing a relationship with the unknown dawn
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Essay on Silver Bullets Marshall
- Re: why hierarchy? Keith H Duggar
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Keith H Duggar
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue J M Davitt
- Re: Establishing a relationship with the unknown Kenneth Downs
- Re: Establishing a relationship with the unknown Erwin
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Anith Sen
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
- How to update multiple rows atomically Marshall
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
- Water And Nan electronics Will Mix To Create Ultra-dense Memory Storage Devices. studiescircle_at_yahoo.com
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? kvnkrkptrck_at_gmail.com
- Ben-Michael Schueler Paul Mansour
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
Saturday, 29 July 2006
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically Marshall
- ER Diagram Help maccessgirl_at_gmail.com
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue J M Davitt
- Re: ER Diagram Help J M Davitt
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Marshall
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically Tonkuma
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue David Cressey
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically Bob Badour
- Re: ER Diagram Help Bob Badour
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically Tony Andrews
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically Marshall
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically Marshall
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically Marshall
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically Cimode
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically Bob Badour
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically Marshall
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically Marshall
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically Bob Badour
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically paul c
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically paul c
- STOP what you�re doing - It doesn�t work! 66ED vwcnesbq_at_email.adr
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
Sunday, 30 July 2006
- Re: ER Diagram Help paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically Marshall
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
- Re: ER Diagram Help Bob Badour
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically J M Davitt
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically paul c
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically Marshall
- Re: MVCC implementation Marshall
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue JOG
- Re: why hierarchy? JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue David Cressey
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
- sets of sets paul c
- SQL colum names conventions! mail_at_jazzis.com
- Re: SQL colum names conventions! Marshall
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue paul c
- Re: SQL colum names conventions! mail_at_jazzis.com
- Re: sets of sets dawn
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Bob Badour
- Re: sets of sets Cimode
- Re: SQL colum names conventions! Gints Plivna
- Re: Database design ideas or templates... Gints Plivna
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue Brian Selzer
Monday, 31 July 2006
- Re: sets of sets paul c
- Re: sets of sets paul c
- Re: How to update multiple rows atomically paul c
- Flashes of Light on the Faith booktwo_at_lorenzocrescini.it
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: Flashes of Light on the Faith Marshall
- Re: sets of sets Erwin
- Re: sets of sets Cimode
- Re: Techie Stuff ... Cimode
- [SPAM] Re: Techie Stuff ... Kenneth Downs
- Re: Techie Stuff ... Marshall
- publically accessible SQL databases Rob
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? JOG
- Re: why hierarchy? Marshall
- Re: How will schemas be affected by nested relations? kvnkrkptrck_at_gmail.com
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? Andy Dingley
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue JOG
- Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue JOG
- Re: why hierarchy? JOG
- Re: why hierarchy? Bob Badour
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo
- Re: why hierarchy? Neo

Last message date: Mon Jul 31 2006 - 23:47:58 CEST
Archived on: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 20:07:00 CEST

1057 messages sort by: [ thread ] [ author ] [ date ] [ subject ]
Nearby: [ About this archive ] [ Other mail archives ]