Re: why hierarchy?

From: J M Davitt <jdavitt_at_aeneas.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 02:58:52 GMT
Message-ID: <Mrzzg.39489$vl5.1723@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com>

Bob Badour wrote:
> Aloha Kakuikanu wrote:
>

>> Neo wrote:
>>
>>> which would confuse most people since, for starters,
>>> john is not a verb/relator.
>>
>>
>> Do you expect the "relator" to be in the dummies vocabulary?

>
>
> If he had, could we send John to jail for having relations with a verb?
> Should we?

Don't we first have to know how old the verb is? Do I correctly presume that "relations" refers to the variety of intercourse which isn't social? Received on Mon Jul 31 2006 - 21:58:52 CDT