Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 19:46:01 GMT
Message-ID: <Z%7zg.29450$pu3.405787@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>

David Cressey wrote:

> "JOG" <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote in message
> news:1154262656.521112.118530_at_b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>

>>This discussion has illuminated me, and I would like to share that. A
>>row is of course merely a proposition,

>
> A small but important (IMO) correction:
>
> A row contains a proposition. That's not quite equivalent to saying that a
> row is a proposition.

Actually, containment implies something physical. A row represents a proposition. Received on Sun Jul 30 2006 - 14:46:01 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Cimode: "Re: sets of sets"
Previous message: Bob Badour: "Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue"
In reply to: David Cressey: "Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue"
Next in thread: JOG: "Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue"
Reply: JOG: "Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue"
Reply: J M Davitt: "Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US