Re: Surrogate Keys: an Implementation Issue
From: paul c <toledobythesea_at_oohay.ac>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 17:14:15 GMT
Message-ID: <HN5zg.274778$iF6.97061_at_pd7tw2no>
>
>
> A small but important (IMO) correction:
>
> A row contains a proposition. That's not quite equivalent to saying that a
> row is a proposition.
>
>
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 17:14:15 GMT
Message-ID: <HN5zg.274778$iF6.97061_at_pd7tw2no>
David Cressey wrote:
> "JOG" <jog_at_cs.nott.ac.uk> wrote in message
> news:1154262656.521112.118530_at_b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> This discussion has illuminated me, and I would like to share that. A >> row is of course merely a proposition,
>
>
> A small but important (IMO) correction:
>
> A row contains a proposition. That's not quite equivalent to saying that a
> row is a proposition.
>
>
Or a row stands for a proposition?
(at least most of the time, ie., when the 'row' has at least one 'column'! I know that's really nonsense, I was just trying to refer to Hugh Darwen's "the king of France is bald" example on dbdebunk.com.)
p Received on Sun Jul 30 2006 - 19:14:15 CEST