Re: why hierarchy?
From: Kenneth Downs <knode.wants.this_at_see.sigblock>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:00:06 -0400
Message-Id: <kajlp3-204.ln1_at_pluto.downsfam.net>
>
> Does the below updated description explain it sufficiently?
>
>
> This example models the following things:
>
> A thing named God.
> A person named Adam.
> A person named Eve.
> A person named John whose age is 35.
> A person named Mary whose age is 25.
>
> A thing named Universe.
> A planet named Mars.
> A planet named Venus.
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 22:00:06 -0400
Message-Id: <kajlp3-204.ln1_at_pluto.downsfam.net>
Neo wrote:
>> You leave it up to us to infer the /what/ or /semantics/ by essentially >> guessing. That is inefficient and annoying.
>
> Does the below updated description explain it sufficiently?
>
>
> This example models the following things:
>
> A thing named God.
> A person named Adam.
> A person named Eve.
> A person named John whose age is 35.
> A person named Mary whose age is 25.
>
> A thing named Universe.
> A planet named Mars.
> A planet named Venus.
Sounds like Perelandra.
-- Kenneth Downs Secure Data Software, Inc. (Ken)nneth_at_(Sec)ure(Dat)a(.com)Received on Thu Jul 27 2006 - 04:00:06 CEST