Neo wrote:
>> You leave it up to us to infer the /what/ or /semantics/ by essentially
>> guessing. That is inefficient and annoying.
>
> Does the below updated description explain it sufficiently?
>
>
> This example models the following things:
>
> A thing named God.
> A person named Adam.
> A person named Eve.
> A person named John whose age is 35.
> A person named Mary whose age is 25.
>
> A thing named Universe.
> A planet named Mars.
> A planet named Venus.
Sounds like Perelandra.
--
Kenneth Downs
Secure Data Software, Inc.
(Ken)nneth@(Sec)ure(Dat)a(.com)
Received on Wed Jul 26 2006 - 21:00:06 CDT
