Re: why hierarchy?

From: Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:20:34 GMT
Message-ID: <mDMxg.21216$pu3.353532_at_ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>

Joe Kesselman wrote:

> Reminder: XML is intended as an interchange syntax, and therefore was
> designed for maximum simplicity.

If that was a design criterion, they failed miserably. Received on Wed Jul 26 2006 - 18:20:34 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: paul c: "Re: why hierarchy?"
Previous message: Tony D: "Re: Can relvars be dissymetrically decomposed? (vadim and x insight demanded on that subject)"
In reply to Joe Kesselman: "Re: why hierarchy?"
Next in thread: erk: "Re: why hierarchy?"
Reply: Andy Dingley: "Re: why hierarchy?"
Reply: erk: "Re: why hierarchy?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message