Re: I think that relational DBs are dead. See link to my article inside
From: U-gene <grigoriev-e_at_yandex.ru>
Date: 10 Jul 2006 12:22:00 -0700
Message-ID: <1152559320.625495.319250_at_35g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
Date: 10 Jul 2006 12:22:00 -0700
Message-ID: <1152559320.625495.319250_at_35g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
Just a remark.
IMHO this is usual set of fallacies exiting today.
- RDBMS isn't system of data persisting only. RDM is not model of persitance of data but it is data model. I think relational systems could exist which aren't DBMS and these systems could be helpfull (i'm about rel.keys and rel.operations here).
- I'm sure - there is no impedance. At all. Impedance exists in your heads only when you think about current implementations of RDM.But I think that these implementations are just very special case of possible implementation what is rich enough to be both OO and relational.