Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me

Re: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count: Was: What databases have taught me

From: Chris Smith <cdsmith_at_twu.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 12:13:08 -0600
Message-ID: <MPG.1f1700a2b19e556198974e@news.altopia.net>


Bob Badour <bbadour_at_pei.sympatico.ca> wrote:
> How about a simulation instead? For things like the weather, climate
> change, epidemiology, fluid flows around objects like propellers, or the
> norwegian simulations back in the 1960's that OO was invented for.

This is a little OT, but as it turns, there's a pretty big difference between discrete simulations and continuous simulations. OO isn't really any stronger at continuous simulations than anything else I can think of. I'd think one would use continuous methods for simulating fluid flows, since it's basically a matter of solving the Navier-Stokes equations. Simula was designed for discrete event simulations, which works for stuff like social models, population biology, etc.

-- 
Chris Smith - Lead Software Developer / Technical Trainer
MindIQ Corporation
Received on Thu Jul 06 2006 - 13:13:08 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US