Re: RM's Canonical database (was: Bob's 'Self-aggrandizing ignorant' Count)

From: Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries_at_acm.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 03:05:18 -0400
Message-ID: <vedpa215clset04qo34n7e2g7231f01k85@4ax.com>

On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 14:07:11 -0700, Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_ucantrade.com.NOTHERE> wrote:

>>The "middle tier" is a common layer of software presenting business objects and
>>associated rules, mediating all access to the database, and using which all the
>>enterprise's applications are written.
>
> A DBMS could easily fit that definition, except possibly the last
>one, and that one is the app language. (You need the app language so
>that you have a middle.)
>
>>Would that work for you as a working definition?
>
> No. After all, a DBMS is, by definition, intended to be between
>the data and the user.

In what way did I suggest that it wasn't between the data and the user?

User -> application software -> middle tier software -> dbms -> data

would be the picture I have in mind.

-- 
Ron Jeffries
www.XProgramming.com
I'm giving the best advice I have. You get to decide if it's true for you.

Received on Thu Jul 06 2006 - 02:05:18 CDT